Difference between revisions of "FAQ"

From PlebNet Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Q1 = =Q2 =")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=Q1 =
== Q1 Recommendations for Good Peers ==


=Q2 =
There is no straightforward recommendation.
 
1- I would recommend all my channels as good peers. My channel list is [https://amboss.space/node/03c5528c628681aa17ab9e117aa3ee6f06c750dfb17df758ecabcd68f1567ad8c1 public (like everyone else)]
2- [https://terminal.lightning.engineering/ Terminal] ranks peers based on their criteria.
3- [https://lnnodeinsight.com/ lnnode] helps you do channel simulation of how your centrality is impacted by adding someone as a peer.
4- [https://gridflare.xyz/ gridflare] provides recommendations individual to your own channel.
5- Communicating within [https://t.me/plebnet plebnet groups] let you interact with node operators who you can judge from their interaction as good peers
6- ultimately anyone willing to open up their node for routing and investing, time, effort, and sats to operate a lightning node is a good peer.
 
Also see [[https://plebnet.wiki/wiki/Main_Page#Opening_Channels]] and [[https://plebnet.wiki/wiki/Main_Page#Resources]]
 
== Q2 ==

Revision as of 10:31, 20 September 2021

Q1 Recommendations for Good Peers

There is no straightforward recommendation.

1- I would recommend all my channels as good peers. My channel list is public (like everyone else) 2- Terminal ranks peers based on their criteria. 3- lnnode helps you do channel simulation of how your centrality is impacted by adding someone as a peer. 4- gridflare provides recommendations individual to your own channel. 5- Communicating within plebnet groups let you interact with node operators who you can judge from their interaction as good peers 6- ultimately anyone willing to open up their node for routing and investing, time, effort, and sats to operate a lightning node is a good peer.

Also see [[1]] and [[2]]

Q2